|
Amador, Edgar A. (M.A.). Globalization, Ecotourism, and Development
in the Monte Verde Zone, Costa Rica (Purcell), 2004.
Abstract: Ecotourism has been promoted globally as a model for sustainable
development because it simultaneously benefits the environment and the
residents of the given destination. However, many conservationists have
questioned the long term sustainability of ecotourism as it is difficult
to mitigate the impact of even low levels of tourism on a particular
ecosystem. Further, social scientists including anthropologists have
similarly questioned whether most residents of a particular destination
actually benefit significantly from the alternative tourism economy.
The
Globalization Research Center in cooperation with the Monteverde Institue
in the Monte Verde Zone, Costa Rica, is undertaking a longitudinal study – dubbed
the Triangulation Study – to understand the effects that development through
ecotourism has on human and natural systems. In order to collect preliminary
data, the Globalization Research Center funded the Development Survey which was
designed to collect demographic data from a representative stratified random
sample of household from nine communities in the Monte Verde Zone. Basic descriptive
information was also collected for all of the businesses in the area that would
agree to participate. The data collected showed that there is a significant difference
in the extent that the nine communities in the Monte Verde Zone are involved
in and perhaps benefiting from ecotourism despite the fact that their opinions
about ecotourism are mostly positive. The communities located on the main road
to the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve have demographic statistics that are
significantly different from communities that are off the main road, and all
communities are significantly different from the Monteverde community. Further,
the ecotouristic businesses are located in these road proximate communities.
Like the ecotourism literature predicted, the majority of the businesses are
small and locally owned. Further study that carefully looks at the differences
between those communities closest to the road and those furthest away is recommended.
Perhaps a repetition of the Development Survey after a period of time would help
elucidate changes in the Zone.
| |
 |
 |
|
|
|