To: Joint Fire Science Program

Re: Interim Report

Project Title: Consequences and correlates of fire in wetlands

Date: 9-30-02

 

 

 

Principal Investigators

 

David Brownlie

US Fish and Wildlife Service

Tall Timbers Research Station

13903 Henry Beadel Dr.

Tallahassee, FL 32313

 

Monica Folk

The Nature Conservancy

2700 Scrub Jay Trail

Kissimmee, FL 34759

 

Gordon Fox

University of South Florida

Department of Biology

4202 E Fowler Ave

Tampa, FL 33620

 

 

Summary of task statements

 

Tasks 1 through 15 are from the Response to Proposal (RTP) titled “Consequences and correlates of fire in wetlands” submitted in August, 2001.  Tasks 16 (Advisory Committee) and 17 (Website) were added later to meet the conditions of the JFSP review board and do not appear in the original RTP.

 

 

 

TASK 1: Collect post fire vegetation data.

Status:           Two years of post-fire vegetation data have been collected.

W/I Budget?           Yes

 

 

 

 TASK 2:           Collect photopoint images.

 Status:           Two years of post-fire photopoints have been collected.

 W/I Budget?          Yes

 

 

 

 TASK 3:      Document canopy scorch height and other post-fire conditions.

 Status:         Collection of canopy char height data is 90% complete and will be completed in the coming quarter.

 W/I Budget? Yes

 

 

 

TASK 4:           Re-measure organic soil depths.

Status:          Collection of organic soil depth data was partially completed, but difficulties with collection method and accuracy concerns are being addressed. This task will be completed in the coming quarter.

 W/I Budget? Yes

 

 

 

TASK 5:       Interview fire personnel about fire characteristics; assemble post-burn evaluations.

Status:          In progress. Draft survey completed and being reviewed by burn manager. Plan to start interviews first week of October 2002.

W/I Budget? Yes

 

 

 

  TASK 6:     Assemble and synthesize pre-fire (1993-1998) vegetation and organic matter depth data and post-fire (1998-present) vegetation data.

Status:         All data sets have been assembled and delivered to USF for analysis.

 W/I Budget? Yes

 

 

 

 TASK 7:      Assemble site history information on each wetland, including wetland type, restoration status, timber and fire history.

Status:         All information and GIS coverages and data sets have been assembled and delivered to USF for analysis.

 W/I Budget? Yes

  

 

 

TASK 8:      Assemble hydrologic, weather and exotics occurrence data for each wetland.

Status:         All data sets have been assembled and delivered to USF for analysis. Updated information on these parameters will be submitted in the coming quarter.

 W/I Budget? Yes

  

 

 

 TASK 9:           Conduct spatial (GIS analysis) to document fire extent, site

conditions.

Status:         This task was completed for the first year, data and information were delivered to USF for analysis.

 W/I Budget? Yes

  

 

 

TASK 10:     Conduct preliminary analyses on pre-and first year post-fire data sets.

Status:         In progress. Our analyses have so far focused on changes in organic soil depth, the reason being that collecting these data is time-consuming, and we wanted to advise TNC about the need for further data. Our analyses point strongly to the need for additional data. The overwhelming majority of sites lost organic soil over the study period, regardless of whether they were burned. Analysis of variance suggests that there is a significant effect of plant community (e.g., with bayheads losing substantially more soil than other communities) as well as community * burned interactions (e.g.,bayheads appear to lose more organic soil in response to fire than any other community, while the marsh and shrub communities lose much less). However, many sample sizes are still quite small (e.g., for many community types we have fewer than 10 sites measured both before and after burns), and the data have signs of being non-normally distributed, even after standard transforms.

 

Consequently, we believe that these results are tantalizing but require substantially more data points before drawing conclusions. The sample sizes for the data currently available are:

 

Community: Unburned, Burned

·        Bayhead 15, 8

·        Cypress dome 13, 4

·        Flatwoods 14, 40

·        Hardwood forest 37, 0

·        Marsh 23, 1

·        Shrub 13, 19

·        Wet prairie 12, 7

 

It is really not possible to draw robust conclusions without further data; sample sizes of 30 or so points for each cell would be preferable, but certainly there should at least be 15 or so points for each before pursuing further analyses.

 

W/I Budget? Yes

 

 

 

TASK 11:           Produce first annual report (aka interim report)

Status:           Completed

W/I Budget? Yes

 

 

NOTE: All tasks scheduled for 2003 (Task 12-15) are not included here as

no work has been done on them.

 

 

 

 

 TASK 16: Assemble Advisory Committee (AC) to ensure participation by

 land managers/specialists in this project. *

 

Status:        Guidelines for function of the AC and meeting timeline listed. Meeting held Sept 4, 2002 at The Nature Conservancy.

Meeting minutes have been completed and sent to participants.

 

Attendees included:

 

 Peter Henn (representing Steve Miller), St Johns River Water Management

 District

 Parks Small, Kissimmee Prairie State Preserve

 Sam van Hook, Avon Park

 Mark Hebb, Florida Department of Forestry

 Rick Anderson, TNC SE Fire Management Officer

 David Black, Dupuis Preserve, SFWMD

 Steve Glass, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

 Wayne Taylor, Preserve Manager – DWP, TNC

 David Brownlie, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service

 Monica Folk, TNC

 Gordon Fox, University of South Florida

 Kinberly Hum, University of South Florida

 

 Not able to attend, but sent regrets:

 Caroline Noble, National Park Service

 Mike Dueitt, Apalachicola National Forest

 

 

 

Task 17:          Web Site development *

Status:           Scheduled for Fall 2003

W/I Budget:          Yes

 

 

* These tasks added the deliverable schedule to meet conditions set by the JFSP review board. They do not appear in the original response’s timeline.